NR 505NP Week 4 Qualitative/Mixed Methods Critique Collaboration Café
University:
Chamberlain University
NR 505NP Week 4 Qualitative/Mixed Methods Critique Collaboration Café
Paper Instructions
With new information continually emerging, professional nurses must be equipped to critique scholarly literature and discern its value for practice.
Select one current, qualitative or mixed methods scholarly nursing article related to your PICOT question and determine its strengths, limitations, and potential application.
Complete the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Appendix E Evidence Appraisal ToolLinks to an external site. Download Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence Based Practice Appendix E Evidence Appraisal Tool. Once you’ve completed the tool, use your own words to summarize your appraisal of the article. Include the following;
- Description of the purpose
- Explanation of research design
- Discussion of sample
- Description of data collection methods
- Summary of findings
- Strengths of the study (minimum of 1)
- Limitations of the study (minimum of 1)
- Recommendations regarding potential application for future practice that are insightful and appropriate.
Attach the article to your post, in addition to including the full reference for the article in your post.
During the week, read a minimum of two articles posted by peers and add your thoughts about whether you feel their article would support an EBP change.
The John Hopkins tool does not need to be turned in, it is a worksheet for you to decide what type of article you have.
We Work Hard So That You Don’t
We’ll write a 100% plagiarism-free paper in under 1 hour.
Sample Answer
The selected article to be reviewed is related to the population section of the PICOT question. The publication titled Older Patients’ Preferences and Views Related To Nonface-To-Face Diabetes Chronic Care Management A Qualitative Study From Southeast Louisiana was written by Bazzano et al. (2019).
Description of the Purpose
This qualitative research aimed to explore older diabetic patients’ opinions and preferences regarding the care management methods nonface-to-face. Additionally, the study’s purpose is to use the results to improve diabetic care for this specific population. Patient information can also be utilized to enhance the quality of care and identify individual needs.
Explanation of Research Design
The research design used the qualitative element of the Louisiana Experiment Assessing Diabetes Outcomes. Case study design and thematic analysis were used for patient interviews. Four coders classified data from interviews, field notes, and discussions. Central themes were conversed among the stakeholders and research team.
Discussion of Sample
The study involved 30 participants, with an average age of 68.3 and 14.5 years since Type 2 diabetes (T2D) diagnosis. Most were female and Medicare-insured, while others had different insurance types. All participants had T2D with at least one coexisting chronic illness. About 13% participated in Nonface-To-Face Diabetes Chronic Care Management (NFF CCM) programs reimbursed by Medicare.
Description of Data Collection Methods
Accordingly, 30 participants, including caregivers, were interviewed using a discussion guide. Between October 2017 and February 2018, interviews were conducted personally or by phone (Bazzano et al., 2019). Audio recordings and field notes were used, ensuring privacy. Researchers followed guidelines for reporting qualitative research and emphasized data completeness and trustworthiness. Tulane University Institutional Review Board permitted the study.
Summary of Findings
This research found that patients felt that communicating with a health professional by phone was relevant. Some patients also noted that personalized relationships with their providers were more effective (Bazzano et al., 2019). Therefore, chronic care management programs must be flexible and responsive to meet individual needs.
The Study’s Strengths and Limitations
One of the study’s strengths was that the results mirrored findings from other research articles. The research also had limitations, including challenges in recruiting participants from different health systems.
Recommendation
At the population level, future research should investigate whether enhancing diabetes care can be achieved by modifying NFF programming and support to eliminate distinctive barriers.
Reference
- Bazzano, A., Monnette, A., Wharton, M., Price-Haywood, E., Nauman, E., Dominick, P., Glover, C., Hu, G., & Shi, L. (2019). Older patients’ preferences and views related to non-face-to-face diabetes chronic care management A qualitative study from southeast Louisiana. Patient Preference and Adherence, 13, 901-911. https //doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s201072 Links to an external site.
week 4 article.pdfDownload week 4 article.pdf
We Work Hard So That You Don’t
We’ll write a 100% plagiarism-free paper in under 1 hour